Just today I saw 5 people in our current church from our former church. These are new this Sunday. One man was a die hard “not going to leave” and his wife was pushing hard to leave. Letting go of two pastors, especially since they are viewed as solid, really put it over. I wonder how many more have jumped ship? Where we live there are hundreds of church options close enough to drive comfortably, so I can imagine if there were 5 in our church there could be many who have left. It will be interesting to see what happens in our former missional/spiritual formation/emergent youth focused/ purpose driven church.
Posts Tagged ‘Leaving a church focused on emergent youth’
New Defections…
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged church, Leaving a church focused on emergent youth, pastors, Purpose Driven, spiritual formation on June 20, 2010| 2 Comments »
What Happens After Leaving a Church Focused on Emergent Youth
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged CHRISTIAN, church, emergent, Leaving a church focused on emergent youth, life after leaving our church, Warrenites on March 28, 2009| 2 Comments »
We decided to leave, met with an elder, and later a pastor. The pastor suggested a letter we AGONIZED over writing. We shared our hearts and concerns boldy at the prodding of this pastor. The lead pastor responded, and didn’t agree. Initially he wanted to meet, then it seemed he didn’t. We weren’t sure. My husband really dreaded meeting with him, and many people actually said things like, “good luck with that” and “wow, well, we’ll be praying for you.” We did ask for advice of a few friends. This was a very hard time.
I felt we’d never find another place. We were used to this former church caring for us, it was one of their strengths. We are a large family on one income, and an elder had told us homeschooling and mom staying home was a good thing so just trust God. We really thought this was right (and still do). Sometimes, this meant our church helped us financially when things got tough, like when my husband lost two jobs and when I had a new baby, or when our furnace just quit in the middle of winter. We also had individual friends help us with emergency plumbing and car repair, and more furnace trouble. We only sought help when we’d exhausted our personal options. We were scared of making it on our own. We do know that things in the future could become hard for us financially. We do not expect others to pick up the bill. Now that time has passed and we’re chugging forward, we really feel we’ll be okay. What we have witnessed in our new church shows that people are loving, and we’ve already had an opportunity to serve.
In our new church, there is a family with serious issues. The mother, a wage earner, has cancer. Treatments are difficult and some haven’t worked as planned. Mom is sick, and often has to be hospitalized and kids have to stay away when they catch cold because of the compromised immune system. This new church has taken a stand from the pulpit. The father gives updates frequently. The church people provide meals for this family several times a week, housekeeping, laundry, and rides for the girls. There have been individuals who have gone to the hospital to sit with the mother and take her to the bathroom, etc. so that she’s not neglected by nursing staff. I do not know if any financial assistance has happened. Most of all, there is prayer. The congregation has been given purple bracelets, which remind each of us to pray for the family. There have been times when people sign up to pray for ten minute incriments in the day for this family. Completely surrounded, that’s what’s happening. The call in a bad economy with difficulty has been to look within the body and to step up and care for each other. What is awesome about this is that I do not believe the gospel is being dumbed down in order to get people to serve. There has been no cry that church as usual is weak, and we need to get off our duffs to prove ourselves. What has happened is a family has been lifted up and the true compassion of the church people has come out to meet the needs. We have been convicted to find our ways to help, and others are likely to be there too.
So, what has happened since we left our church? We found out who our true friends were there, and we have found new friends in a new church. No, the new church is not perfect. I will continue to pray for our former church as brothers and sisters in Christ fight the battle there whether they know it or not. I will pray for our new church, that the staff leadership stand guard and keep themselves focused on Christ and the scriptures. I believe we have found that God does have his people in the positions they are in for a reason. We were so blind, we’ve learned to pay more attention. We’ve learned to watch out better for our kids. We’ve learned to speak up after careful consideration and prayer. We’ve learned to be firm. We’ve seen we sometimes cannot trust those we think we can.
Now we move forward. It’s actually been good NOT to be in a small group. We have more family time. Our children need to spend time in our church for sure, but we should be building the relationships at home too. We have examined our beliefs, and it’s been hard but good.
On a side note, some we thought were “shunning” us actually have responded lately. It seems life just threw them some hard days and they weren’t checking email. This is not the pastors who haven’t answered email…just the few members. So, it wasn’t all what it seemed to us. Sure, we do have one individual who is being very weird, but I think she’d be that way anyway. Some of the other couples have not been so cold as we thought.
No More Footnotes
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged cite sources, emergent, emergent church, emerging, Leaving a church focused on emergent youth, missional, quotes on January 8, 2009| 2 Comments »
The last Sunday we attended our former church the “missional pastor” spoke. He’s the one we quoted in the letter, he’s the one who quoted emergent authors with no warnings. It’s been several months, and he has been out of the country being missions oriented. The church was also having a campaign to raise money, and also had special Christmas messages. So, when I saw he spoke, I really wanted to see what was up. Interesting, he had no more footnotes, no more citing authors. If you want to know his influences you have to ask (hoping he’d be honest) or try to figure it out for yourself somehow.
Too Much Talk
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged Christ centered, emergent, emerging, humility, Leaving a church focused on emergent youth, not not emergent, pastor, pastors, prayer, pride, seeker friendly, seeker sensitive movement, Warrenites on November 27, 2008| 7 Comments »
My husband called an elder and left a message after we heard the sermon online. Last night, he called back when my husband wasn’t home. We discussed the open pulpit comment, and the elder was not comfortable with that at all. I kept saying I could understand the pastor’s position in some ways (and I can) in that he wants to likely let the person who said something about overhearing know he means business as well as he thinks we’re wrong and wants to make it clear. He did define emergent, said it was bad (yay) and said their church isn’t emergent. Again, maybe not overall, but there still are connections that need to be dealt with. I told the elder this. I also mentioned that the connect the dots comment really was something said to us in a meeting, so I am not suprised it came out (we connected dots from one author to another to make a weak connection to emergent according to the pastor). The conversation kept up and the elder ended up boiling down what he thinks the issue is…that we claimed in our letter that the church has shifted focus from Christ and from giving glory to God. The elder said it was the only statment he felt we came up with that wasn’t okay to say. This was a bold statement, I know. However, my husband and I believe the church is focusing more on man and man’s methods than just on the plain thing of glorifying God. Messages (even now) don’t have Christ as the focus, but on “kingdom building” or on fund raising for building the church. Scripture is used as a means to some sort of end. Yes, the thought is, we’re paying all this staff to preach the good news, we need audio visual because it’s better for our congregation and brings people in, this or that program will bring people in. I could go on and on as to why they justify the way they do things. The plain truth is the congregation (when we were there) was not being fed. I stated this to the elder in so many words, and he stuck on the point that we wrote something in our letter we surely didn’t mean. He’d been with the pastors overseas on short term missions, even speaking recently about this specific letter with the pastor who quoted the emergent leaders (not the one who mentioned us this weekend, but another). The pastor said he couldn’t understand why the first time he mentioned contemporary authors someone began to pick that sermon apart. Now he felt he couldn’t just quote anyone and had to watch every word because people were scrutinizing what he was saying. (uh, aren’t we supposed to pay attention to what people say from the pulpit?). He said he could easily quote from someone and embrace one idea without embracing all of emergent. Yep, true. Still…would we quote a Mormon from the pulpit because we agree with the ideas but don’t embrace all of the emergent? No, we would not at least without some sort of disclaimer. The elder kept coming back to the point that we needed to examine whether or not the church had Christ at the center. His point was that it wasn’t actually church if Christ wasn’t at the center. Yep, that’s why we left. Using 40 Days of Purpose like it was something magical, following the P.E.A.C.E. plan, getting into Dallas Willard, doing children’s church with much video, much filler activity, focusing on seekers, and on and on. I told the elder I felt that though the scripture was used, and even now whole passages of Nehemiah are read outloud word for word and preached on, that scripture can be mishandled. I brought up the speaker, Stephen Smith, who spoke of Lazarus and reworked it for a pop psychology purpose. The elder commented, (and I laugh as I write this) that the speaker was off his rocker anyway. What? Why was he speaking from our pulpit then? Why in our final meeting did the pastor say he would not have this man in the pulpit if he didn’t endorse his ideas. In fact, the pastor had recommended his book and tried to personally promote it. So I guess the elder and the pastor don’t see eye to eye on this speaker? Who knew.
We had been learning about God for a while, and felt we were okay in this church over the years. At some point we realized that some of what filled us was small group because we had Bible study there. We had friendships that filled us, and kept us feeling like we were being fed. Church was our social place, and there is nothing wrong with socializing with believers. I believe the other believers did help us and we learned from them. We took from messages what we wanted to and we left the rest sit. If you are a Christian, you can grow on a little and you can grow on what you do on your own. However, and this is key, people who are in other churches who have left our former church tell us that they didn’t realize how much they weren’t growing until they went elsewhere and found themselves actually fed and actually growing more than they would have. One family left our former church because they worked in children’s ministry. They didn’t like what they were seeing for their children, they couldn’t settle anymore. They left, and a byproduct of leaving was that they grew at their new church. It wasn’t just their children, they weren’t being taught enough, fed enough.
Everytime I begin to wonder if we’re crazy, I sit down and think about it. No, we’re not crazy. We saw what we saw. The reaction of the pastor was almost word for word what we read would happen in a church affiliated with Rick Warren. The pastor’s reaction to us shows us a LOT. The elder (we love this man) who is very sincere still is putting almost all of this on us, we are in error (not sinning according to him, not needing to confess a sin). He believes we need to revisit this in time, and somehow work it out with the church and the pastor. This probably means we will have to recant on what we said, give in. Mean time, the church leadership had to deal with us, and now they have to deal with what is left since we are gone, since we spoke up. They have to either dismiss us or agree and then open that can of worms for themselves. One friend who left before we did said that at least they didn’t ignore our concerns as they did his (for TWO years). The pastor mentioned it from the pulpit, and he’s likely to get more questions from it then he ever would have. Maybe some others will investigate. I can almost bet some out there will too. This isn’t the end of this topic for our former church. They will have to deal with this until God lets them go.
And still, I’m thankful for being confronted on gossip or on my attitude when speaking about our former church. I need to be truthful, and need to also be loving. I do not have to love what has happened, but I do need to pray for the church, the pastors, and need to pray for the flock there. I need to, when speaking, not feel proud of my self like I am anything. I am nothing. I was in it, I nodded and let it go when I could have spoken up earlier. I wasn’t responsible and in the Word enough. I didn’t have enough nor use discernment wisely. I believe I was selfish and that’s why I didn’t see. The drama is not something to relish in, to focus on. The time is always fresh for focusing on Christ, and next on my family.
Actually
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged Bible, breaking up is hard to do, church breakups, Dallas Willard, disowned, donald miller, emergent, emergent church, Leaving a church focused on emergent youth, missional, Nooma, P.E.A.C.E. plan, Purpose Driven, Rob Bell, seeker friendly, spiritual formation on November 22, 2008| 2 Comments »
I actually believe our former pastor may mention our names at least in an elder meeting. Because one of us was overheard talking about the church, I just wonder what will come of it? During the call, my husband shared that he cannot possibly stop telling people who ask why we left the church honestly what he thinks. The pastor then said something like, “so likewise, I can share about you spreading rumors and saying things we don’t agree with.” My husband said he didn’t care what they say. It may have not been that harsh, really, from the pastor. It was what I thought my husband said, but it was along those lines. At any rate, I wonder if there will be some sort of larger group that will hear about this? At any rate, it is what it is.
I don’t believe we ever said the former church was 100% emergent. I do believe we said there were emergent phrases and authors popping up in sermons, and that the youth camp was emergent. The type of prayer has been mentioned as a problem to pastors, one even contacted the youth camp to get the example of prayer off the web site stating it’s not Biblical. Last time I checked, it’s still there. The pastor told my husband about Noomas being shown to the youth…and this was not something we’d ever heard. It was in the context of, “I thought we agreed to be discreed about [minister X] and the Noomas.” Huh. So, though it wasn’t my husband who had this discussion, and I don’t recall us talking about minister X, someone has AND at least one Nooma has been shown to youth somewhere, somehow through this church. Yet there is denial of emergent creeping in? The pastor still was frustrated that we made connections based on who was quoted in sermons. Okay, truthfully, it wasn’t just quotes. A sermon was framed right from Donald Miller’s stuff. I heard a podcast and the idea came directly from the podcast of Miller’s. Even if only one pastor on staff was saying this stuff, it shows he is into emergent teaching and he promoted it right from the pulpit. To NOT address this is wrong. So, yeah, since that pastor is still on staff, there is an emergent element in our former church.
One thing that has been true of our former church is they have been on the Warren P.E.A.C.E. plan. So, I guess we can call them what? Seeker friendly? The pastors all read Dallas Willard and many recommended his works to me to read. So, we can call the church what? Contemplative/Spiritual Formation influenced? The church itself uses terms like “Bible based” and “Missional.” So, it’s an emergent/contemplative/Spirtual Formation/Missional/Bible influence church. ECSFMBIC
Of course, we’re supposed to never say this church is emergent because that movement is dying, according to what the former pastor said. Huh. Bet there was a day when someone thought the Mormon church was dying too when it was in it’s early years. Of course, renaming yourself or infiltrating churches through the back door, and many times through the front, doesn’t make you a “church” so much as it makes the churches you. But, no, pastor…it’s not dying. It’s doing what it has been made to do, it’s evolving.